AI-powered material review for Nigerian firms
Compare proposed building materials with your project requirements.
Check the sources and keep a clear decision.
Read the specification.
Approve the details that matter.
F–01 / Ground floor
See what the supplier states.
Open the evidence before deciding.
How it works
Your specifications on one side. Their documents on the other.
A clear comparison in between.
F–01 / Ground floor
Add your specification or finish schedule. Check the extracted details and approve your baseline.
Upload the supplier’s files and choose the exact product and variant to review.
Open the source behind each finding, ask for clarification and record your decision.
Who it’s for
A shared review workspace for Nigerian architectural practices, contractors and developers.
Keep the design specification beside each proposed material. Record your review before a substitution is accepted.
Check the exact product offered by your supplier, raise questions and give the purchasing team a clear decision.
Keep requirements, supplier revisions and approval records in one place across the project.
Owners manage staff. Contributors add documents. Assigned reviewers decide. Viewers follow the record.
Core features
Five tools for reviewing proposed building materials.
Use your own project and supplier documents.
Upload your specification, BOQ or finish schedule. Check the extracted requirements, then choose the exact product from the supplier’s files. Compare sizes, finishes and stated properties against your approved requirements.
Matches · Conflicts · Missing evidence · UnclearStart with your filesFeature previews use sample documents. Start a review to process your own files.
The working workspace
Your projects, supplier proposals and decisions in one place. Open a review to check the evidence and keep the record.
Sign up to start a review
Filter by project, status or assigned reviewer. Open a decision, continue a comparison or see what is missing.
Inspect the completed reviewsScreens captured from the local test workspace. Your company’s workspace shows its own saved records. The public reviews below can be inspected without signing in.
What we check
Check size, finish, grade and product details.
Catch the differences before you order.
Material intelligence
AI reads the details. Rules check the values.
You make the decision.
Read scanned pages and photos. Keep the page or spreadsheet cells behind each extracted detail.
Extract requirements and supplier product details. Choose the exact product and variant to compare.
Open the requirement and the supplier statement behind a finding. See which supporting documents are missing.
Compare sizes and finishes. Flag conflicts, missing evidence and unclear information.
Draft supplier questions, record your decision and download the saved review as PDF or CSV.
Follow the files from upload to the reviewer’s decision.
Your selected PDF pages, product photos or spreadsheet cells.
Native PDF text and spreadsheet readers keep page and cell locations. Document AI reads scanned pages and images. Unreadable pages produce an error or an unclear result.
Stored source blocks: the text, document version and page region or cell reference.
Seen in the completed testsThe public tests read IOM BOQ pages 9 and 13 and one-page supplier excerpts using native PDF text.
Inspect a saved resultTested with Nigerian documents
A Lagos project BOQ. Tile and paint product documents.
Inspect the saved findings, sources and reports.
600x1200mm · Ultra Polish
Have a specification and a supplier datasheet? Run a review with your own files.
Start with your filesA record you can return to.
Save the findings, source references, reviewer notes and decision in one report. Download a PDF or CSV and return to the reviewed versions when the supplier sends a revision.
About Mat3
Construction teams work with specifications, supplier proposals and changing product options every day. Mat3 brings those details into one review record.
Mat3 helps Nigerian teams review building-material submissions. It works with the requirements and product statements in your files. Upload the documents, check the findings and sources, then keep your decision and report in the project record.
Pricing in naira
Try your documents in the free pilot. Choose a paid plan when your team is ready.
Try Mat3 with your own material documents.
No payment needed. Two jobs can run at once.
For architectural practices reviewing supplier proposals.
Team and usage allowance agreed before activation.
For firms coordinating reviews across their projects.
Team and usage allowance agreed before activation.
For larger teams with a specific review workload.
A plan based on your team and review volume.
Paid plans begin after your demo and agreed allowances. No payment is taken here. Annual prices cover 12 months with two months free.
See which documents to bringChoose tiles, paint and coatings, doors and windows, roofing, cement and concrete, reinforcement steel, plumbing, electrical materials or another building material. Set the properties your project requires and select the exact supplier product. Checks depend on the evidence in your documents; each material has its own requirements.
PDF, JPEG, PNG, WebP, HEIC, XLSX and CSV. Each file can be up to 25 MB. You can select PDF pages or spreadsheet ranges before processing.
Google Gemini reads your uploaded documents to extract project requirements and supplier statements, identify product variants and interpret wording. Document AI reads scanned pages and images. Comparison rules check sizes, finishes and compatible values. You review the sources and record the decision.
Yes. Start a review, create a project and material item, then upload your requirements and supplier files. The public sample is a separate example; your review is processed from the files you upload.
Create a clarification draft from the findings, edit it and save it with the review. Copy or download it to send through your email or messaging app. You can reopen a saved draft and edit a copy.
After the reviewer records a decision, generate a PDF report or CSV export. Both keep the findings, sources and decision for those document versions. The saved report remains available after a later submission revision.
A match means the submitted documents support the approved requirement. Your reviewer remains responsible for suitability, the physical sample and checking the authenticity of certificates.
The assigned reviewer can record a correction with a reason. The original machine finding stays in the history, and both appear in the report.
Create a new submission revision, select the revised product and compare again. Earlier decisions remain attached to the versions that were reviewed.
Only the assigned project reviewer can record the final decision. An unconditional approval is blocked while required findings remain unresolved.
The app shows an actionable processing error. Upload a clearer copy or select a smaller scope. It does not treat an unreadable file as missing evidence or a completed review.
For Nigerian architectural and fit-out teams
